<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Setting up Debian with up to date packages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timothybowler.com/2009/12/03/setting-up-debian-with-up-to-date-packages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timothybowler.com/2009/12/03/setting-up-debian-with-up-to-date-packages/</link>
	<description>Certified Scrum Master &#124; Certified Scrum Practitioner &#124; Agile Coach &#124; Agile Practitioner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 01:21:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Bowler</title>
		<link>http://timothybowler.com/2009/12/03/setting-up-debian-with-up-to-date-packages/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Bowler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timothybowler.com/?p=267#comment-191</guid>
		<description>Your right, the backports options seems to be a good way. However, on a production server I think there is too much risk in using unstable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your right, the backports options seems to be a good way. However, on a production server I think there is too much risk in using unstable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luca Bruno</title>
		<link>http://timothybowler.com/2009/12/03/setting-up-debian-with-up-to-date-packages/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Luca Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timothybowler.com/?p=267#comment-175</guid>
		<description>If you want up-to-date repositories use testing/unstable or backports instead of unofficial repositories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want up-to-date repositories use testing/unstable or backports instead of unofficial repositories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craigevil</title>
		<link>http://timothybowler.com/2009/12/03/setting-up-debian-with-up-to-date-packages/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>craigevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timothybowler.com/?p=267#comment-169</guid>
		<description>There are tons of 3rd party repos for Debian, the problem lies with only using ones that you can trust.
Here is a list that I have put together: http://sites.google.com/site/mydebiansourceslist/Home</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are tons of 3rd party repos for Debian, the problem lies with only using ones that you can trust.<br />
Here is a list that I have put together: <a href="http://sites.google.com/site/mydebiansourceslist/Home" rel="nofollow">http://sites.google.com/site/mydebiansourceslist/Home</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADFA</title>
		<link>http://timothybowler.com/2009/12/03/setting-up-debian-with-up-to-date-packages/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>ADFA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timothybowler.com/?p=267#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Do you really trust an unofficial repository? Why don&#039;t you use debian backports?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you really trust an unofficial repository? Why don&#8217;t you use debian backports?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
